Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59468

in Power, MontanaPopulation 858

47.82/ 100

Ranked #19,156 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #202 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #10 of 17 Great Falls, MT ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

6.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

7 days/year

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST40th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.8%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

95.6%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Power, Montana (ZIP 59468), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,156th) and the bottom 41% of Montana (202nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: walkability lies in the bottom 2.7% nationally, modeled nitrate sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled fine-particle settles in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled radon registers in the top 8.9% nationally, slow internet speeds stands in the top 10.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover lands in the bottom 10.8% nationally. More encouragingly, elder services is in the top 0.5% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and fiber broadband lies in the top 9.9% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 59404, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Great Falls, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%28.0–33.6
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.5–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.6–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.6
Depression among adults25.3%22.5–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%32.2–39.0
Obesity among adults33.1%27.8–39.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.3%12.9–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.2–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%71.8–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults71.9%68.5–74.9
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.9–83.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%58.3–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.3%59.3–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%65.1–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%16.6–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.4–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%21.2–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%26.5–34.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.2–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.6–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.2–18.0
Any disability among adults35.0%31.3–39.1
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.8–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.1–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.8–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription81.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate91.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+28.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age47.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$82,895$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$239,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$700$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.4178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.41 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured