Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59412

in Belt, MontanaPopulation 1,685

51.61/ 100

Ranked #13,953 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #126 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #4 of 17 Great Falls, MT ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.0%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4.4 days/year

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.99 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST36th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

41.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.2%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Belt, Montana (ZIP 59412), overall, ranks in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,953rd) and the top 37% of Montana (126th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and recreation stands in the top 6.1% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 7.3% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 8.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Fatal road crashes is in the top 6.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled radon lands in the top 9.2% nationally.

Defined simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 59463, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Great Falls, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 1.0%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.8–37.9
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.9–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.5–8.8
Depression among adults25.5%22.6–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.6–41.3
Obesity among adults34.5%30.4–39.0
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.1–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.3–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.5–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.0%74.1–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%84.8–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.6–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.3%63.3–69.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%74.3–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.0–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.1–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.8–25.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%30.2–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.4–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.4–15.0
Any disability among adults32.8%29.3–36.5
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.4–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.4–24.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.1–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults31.0%27.5–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription71.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate76.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households68.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+22.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age43.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$82,955$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$250,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$781$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured