Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59472

in Sand Coulee, MontanaPopulation 507

51.52/ 100

Ranked #14,083 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #129 of 341 Montana ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #5 of 17 Great Falls, MT ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

3.0%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

4.4 days/year

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.3%

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

11.3 per million

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST62nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

71.4%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

0.85%

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Sand Coulee, Montana (ZIP 59472) stands in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,083rd) and the top 38% of Montana (129th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: civic registers in the top 2.2% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 2.9% nationally, and modeled pfas registers in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 2.3% nationally, walkability is in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and modeled binge drinking registers in the top 8.3% nationally.

For clarity, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 59412, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Great Falls, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.8–35.5
High blood pressure among adults34.2%31.2–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.0–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Depression among adults27.1%24.1–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.7–39.1
Obesity among adults34.2%30.0–38.6
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.5–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.0%73.0–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.6%72.6–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.0–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.7–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%65.2–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%70.8–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.9–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.1–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%18.5–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%29.5–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.0–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.3–16.0
Any disability among adults32.3%28.7–36.1
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.7–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.4–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.6–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.8–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–648.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate91.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households77.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+29.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age54.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$68,036$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$235,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured