Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

59410

in Augusta, MontanaPopulation 520

47.82/ 100

Ranked #19,152 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #201 of 341 Montana ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #17 of 17 Helena, MT ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.44 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

2 days/year

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

29.5 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.9%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.6%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

70.7%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

17.2 mi

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.22%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Augusta, Montana (ZIP 59410), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,152nd) and the bottom 41% of Montana (201st).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: walkability lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and distance to a nursing home stands in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and energy burden settles in the top 4.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room lies in the top 8.0% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled humid heat rests in the bottom 1.2% nationally, industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk is in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 59421, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Helena, MT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.3%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.0%34.6–41.1
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.5–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.7–12.9
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.5–10.1
Depression among adults25.6%22.4–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.3–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.7–41.8
Obesity among adults32.6%27.9–37.2
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%9.9–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.5–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.6–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.6–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.1–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%61.7–70.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.8–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%67.4–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.2–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.7–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.0%18.4–25.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.8%25.8–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.1–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.1–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.9–15.5
Any disability among adults34.6%30.5–38.5
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.3–11.6
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.4–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.5–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.5–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%5.9–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.5
Loneliness among adults29.0%25.4–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.7% (1.9–27.5%) n=360
Uninsured 18–6418.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.1% (0.0–33.1%) n=357
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (0.0–14.1%) n=360
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.6% (12.3–46.1%) n=360
Unemployment rate (16+)7.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.8% (0.0–10.2%) n=357
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–9.5%) n=360
Broadband subscription70.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.1–100.0%) n=360
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.3–37.2%) n=360
Homeownership rate66.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (56.9–95.8%) n=360
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–6.6%) n=360
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–4.9%) n=360
Single-parent households86.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.3% (39.9–84.5%) n=356
Population 65+47.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.0% (12.9–44.0%) n=360
Median age64.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.0 yr (32.9–62.3) n=358
Median household income$42,321$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$66,875 ($44,980–$95,192) n=321
Median home value$259,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$292,450 ($127,430–$548,550) n=312
Median gross rent$828$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$877 ($544–$1,329) n=213
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.7 yr ± 2.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.7 yr (76.7–83.7) n=358

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.65 years of 83.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured