Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

58568

in Selfridge, North DakotaPopulation 544

23.85/ 100

Ranked #31,578 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)

Ranked #370 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 0.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

7.6%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.5%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.9%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.0%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

154.3 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST39th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

28.4 mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Distance to the nearest community health center
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

In overall standing, Selfridge, North Dakota (ZIP 58568) comes out in the bottom 1.6% nationally (31,578th) and the bottom 0.3% of North Dakota (370th).

continue reading

The clearest local signals in the data come through up front: modeled energy burden stands in the top 0.8% nationally, vision disability lands in the top 2.7% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 3.5% nationally, modeled hearing disability rests in the top 2.0% nationally, and distance to a nursing home lies in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and civic registers in the top 1.6% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 1.7% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, civic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 57641, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 1.0%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.1–35.1
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.5–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Current asthma among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
Depression among adults23.1%19.6–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.5%17.2–21.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%31.6–40.2
Obesity among adults47.0%38.2–56.2
Stroke among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.5%24.5–34.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%10.7–15.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.3–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.7%70.6–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults77.7%75.1–80.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.6%49.4–61.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults43.9%39.7–47.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.9%54.6–73.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.0–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults29.0%25.4–32.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.3%31.9–42.9
Short sleep duration among adults42.4%34.8–49.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.4%29.6–37.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.9–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults20.1%17.8–22.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.0%18.5–23.5
Any disability among adults44.9%39.8–50.1
Hearing disability among adults13.0%11.7–14.3
Independent living disability among adults14.9%13.3–16.6
Mobility disability among adults23.2%20.6–25.9
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.2
Vision disability among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.3%24.7–32.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.1%31.3–38.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.4%23.8–30.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.7%20.9–26.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.1%17.1–21.1
Loneliness among adults33.5%28.9–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.7–19.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–6415.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle21.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate59.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households40.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+18.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$58,636$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$81,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent$475$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.9 yr ± 1.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 71.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured