Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

58381

in Warwick, North DakotaPopulation 482

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

38.82/ 100

Ranked #27,533 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranked #359 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

46.2 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

163.9 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST45th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.03%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.7%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.2%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.91%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

13.1 days/year

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

22.4%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

Warwick, North Dakota (ZIP 58381) ranks in the bottom 14.2% nationally (27,533rd) and the bottom 3.3% of North Dakota (359th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: distance to a community health center settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled radon rests in the top 6.5% nationally. Slow internet speeds lands in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled obesity settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled fine-particle rests in the top 9.9% nationally. More positively, distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 1.6% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 10.0% nationally.

For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 58301, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%28.1–34.2
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.6–44.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
Depression among adults22.5%19.6–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%13.0–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.5–41.6
Obesity among adults44.2%37.6–51.1
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.4%19.1–25.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.2–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.7–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.9–78.2
Cholesterol screening among adults81.0%78.7–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.6%54.9–64.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.8%46.4–53.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%63.7–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.6–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.3%19.1–25.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.4%26.8–35.9
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.2–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.8%22.6–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.7–18.8
Any disability among adults37.3%33.1–41.6
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.6–11.8
Independent living disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.4
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.6–20.3
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%20.0–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%18.5–25.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.4%14.4–20.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.5–18.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
Loneliness among adults29.3%25.7–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.2–13.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription94.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate92.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population8.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$90,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value$208,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.1 yr ± 1.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.96 years of 71.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured