Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

58382

in Webster, North DakotaPopulation 108

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

60.30/ 100

Ranked #4,642 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.5%)

Ranked #31 of 371 North Dakota ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

25.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

182.2 mi

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST54th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

44.1 mi

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

85 µg/L

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Webster, North Dakota (ZIP 58382) lands in the top 14.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,642nd) and the top 8.4% of North Dakota (31st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon sits in the top 3.0% nationally, distance to a community health center is in the top 1.6% nationally, and lithium in drinking water settles in the top 4.2% nationally.

A note on the terms: radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 58327, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.2–32.7
High blood pressure among adults35.8%31.6–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%4.7–7.9
Depression among adults18.5%15.7–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%8.8–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.3–43.8
Obesity among adults36.1%29.7–43.3
Stroke among adults3.5%2.9–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.2–9.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%3.9–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.2–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.5–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.6–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.5%66.7–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.6%69.3–75.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%74.0–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.6–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%8.3–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%16.1–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults28.6%23.2–34.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%11.7–18.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.1%10.2–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%9.5–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.7%8.7–13.0
Any disability among adults26.3%21.6–31.6
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.1–11.1
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.0–7.7
Mobility disability among adults11.4%8.8–14.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.4–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.0–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.1–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.1–9.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.8%2.7–5.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.6–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.7
Loneliness among adults25.1%21.3–29.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.7%3.0–4.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.0% (1.0–21.4%) n=380
Uninsured 18–6451.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.5% (0.0–19.2%) n=380
No HS diploma (25+)19.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.6–13.4%) n=382
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (12.5–41.0%) n=382
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–6.5%) n=382
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–7.4%) n=379
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.7% (75.3–98.1%) n=379
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)3.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32215.2% (4.0–28.2%) n=379
Homeownership rate54.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.5% (59.2–98.7%) n=379
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.6%) n=379
Foreign-born population38.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.9% (0.0–5.7%) n=383
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.3% (40.0–83.3%) n=377
Population 65+23.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.6% (9.1–38.9%) n=383
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.9 yr (31.1–60.2) n=381
Median household income$70,536$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,666 ($56,729–$115,391) n=354
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$159,750 ($88,870–$297,180) n=328
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$767 ($513–$1,222) n=212
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ND median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.6–84.0) n=379

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured