Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57725

in Caputa, South DakotaPopulation 130

49.17/ 100

Ranked #17,419 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #280 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #24 of 27 Rapid City, SD ZIPs (bottom 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

0.73 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.3%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

14.5 per million

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.9%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$48,214

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

5.7%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

6.4%

in the bottom 31% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US31st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Caputa, South Dakota (ZIP 57725) ranks in the bottom 46% nationally (17,419th) and the bottom 22% of South Dakota (280th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: walkability sits in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and modeled binge drinking resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden stands in the top 7.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 8.0% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 12.2% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 13.8% nationally. More positively, modeled air-toxics cancer risk sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 57703, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rapid City, SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.3–30.1
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.5–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Depression among adults21.3%18.5–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%11.8–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.8%32.5–39.1
Obesity among adults36.9%32.3–41.6
Stroke among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.6%13.0–18.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.2–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%72.6–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.3%71.9–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%83.8–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%59.7–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%63.0–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%64.5–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.3%18.5–24.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%15.3–22.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%20.9–29.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%29.6–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%16.4–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.7–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.1–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.2–16.7
Any disability among adults32.8%28.2–37.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.0–17.1
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.6–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households86.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+44.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age58.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$48,214$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$283,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured