Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11565

in Malverne, New YorkPopulation 9,009

67.64/ 100

Ranked #1,109 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.5%)

Ranked #166 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 9.6%)

Ranked #312 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

250 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$148,049

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

96.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.5%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.6%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.6%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Malverne, New York (ZIP 11565) lands in the top 3.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,109th) and the top 9.6% of New York (166th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: walkability rests in the top 1.4% nationally, household income registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and fiber broadband resides in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally, modeled colon screening is in the top 3.4% nationally, and homeownership sits in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the bottom 8.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum, and PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the top 5.9% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 11570, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 19.6; chronic-disease standing 80.8 — 61 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,536 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.2%23.0–27.5
High blood pressure among adults32.3%29.6–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.2–5.9
Depression among adults14.3%12.4–16.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%37.8–43.4
Obesity among adults28.1%24.6–31.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%5.1–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%3.9–5.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.8–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.0%80.8–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.2–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.8%71.6–77.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%71.9–76.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%71.7–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.5–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.1%6.7–9.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.8%17.9–23.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%34.1–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%11.4–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.8–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Any disability among adults22.9%20.2–25.7
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.4
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.0–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.4–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.2%4.9–7.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Loneliness among adults29.6%25.9–33.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate96.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population13.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$148,049$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$642,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.03 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured