Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

57319

in Bridgewater, South DakotaPopulation 881

56.57/ 100

Ranked #7,684 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #85 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #25 of 47 Sioux Falls, SD-MN ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.2%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.8%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

69.7 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST33rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

21.9 mi

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

62 µg/L

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.6%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Bridgewater, South Dakota (ZIP 57319) ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,684th) and the top 24% of South Dakota (85th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: pharmacy rests in the top 1.1% nationally, and childcare stands in the top 2.5% nationally. Fiber broadband lies in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 6.6% nationally, and dental providers is in the top 7.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon settles in the top 2.2% nationally, distance to a community health center resides in the top 7.2% nationally, and lithium in drinking water registers in the top 8.4% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 9.6% nationally.

To spell things out, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Close by, ZIP 57058, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.0–32.1
High blood pressure among adults35.0%31.2–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.0–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Depression among adults20.4%17.5–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.1–39.7
Obesity among adults35.6%28.7–42.4
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%9.0–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.3–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.9–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.9–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.0–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%64.5–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.0–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%73.7–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.4–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.5%11.4–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.0–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults28.8%23.3–34.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.3–19.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.0%12.3–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.2–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
Any disability among adults29.8%25.9–33.8
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Mobility disability among adults13.7%11.7–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.1–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2741.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365
Households without a vehicle0.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3221.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364
Broadband subscription89.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32217.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364
Homeownership rate79.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367
Single-parent households61.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367
Median age39.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365
Median household income$69,792$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336
Median home value$170,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311
Median gross rent$729$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$763 ($544–$1,089) n=243
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.4–84.2) n=357

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured