Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202647 of 49 ZIP codes scored · 0.30M residents represented

Score snapshot

58.74Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
56.70Median scoremiddle of 47 scored ZIPs
67.16Highest score57108 · Sioux Falls
49.36Lowest score56138 · Hills
17.79Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#35Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
13%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.04M of 0.30M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.30MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0.30MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 47 of 47
  1. 1,23357108in Sioux Falls · 33,966 residents67.16
  2. 1,23657197in Sioux Falls · 388 residents67.15
  3. 1,61157032in Harrisburg · 10,467 residents66.02
  4. 2,17157064in Tea · 8,032 residents64.57
  5. 2,95957005in Brandon · 12,290 residents63.02
  6. 4,10457020in Crooks · 1,622 residents61.04
  7. 4,16157033in Hartford · 5,576 residents60.95
  8. 4,72657022in Dell Rapids · 5,339 residents60.18
  9. 4,97257105in Sioux Falls · 23,287 residents59.85
  10. 5,00257068in Valley Springs · 1,603 residents59.81
  11. 5,03457041in Lyons · 133 residents59.75
  12. 5,07757035in Humboldt · 1,591 residents59.71
  13. 5,18457110in Sioux Falls · 23,313 residents59.55
  14. 5,37657018in Colton · 1,495 residents59.29
  15. 5,89157077in Worthing · 1,417 residents58.61
  16. 6,11457039in Lennox · 3,622 residents58.35
  17. 6,31057106in Sioux Falls · 51,907 residents58.10
  18. 6,66557030in Garretson · 2,510 residents57.68
  19. 6,66757058in Salem · 1,881 residents57.68
  20. 6,88157003in Baltic · 2,274 residents57.40
  21. 6,98657055in Renner · 1,404 residents57.29
  22. 7,33357048in Montrose · 1,237 residents56.95
  23. 7,35557015in Chancellor · 802 residents56.92
  24. 7,54657047in Monroe · 389 residents56.70
  25. 7,68457319in Bridgewater · 881 residents56.57
  26. 7,70557004in Beresford · 3,834 residents56.55
  27. 7,70757012in Canistota · 1,168 residents56.55
  28. 7,95457374in Spencer · 272 residents56.32
  29. 7,95757053in Parker · 2,220 residents56.31
  30. 8,35957027in Fairview · 199 residents55.93
  31. 8,37457013in Canton · 4,504 residents55.91
  32. 8,39257103in Sioux Falls · 35,582 residents55.89
  33. 8,58157034in Hudson · 661 residents55.74
  34. 9,11457107in Sioux Falls · 12,605 residents55.28
  35. 9,45057043in Marion · 1,630 residents55.00
  36. 10,41757014in Centerville · 1,667 residents54.22
  37. 11,91557036in Hurley · 667 residents53.12
  38. 11,99257070in Viborg · 1,469 residents53.06
  39. 12,35056156in Luverne · 6,371 residents52.82
  40. 13,01657021in Davis · 319 residents52.32
  41. 13,96056134in Hardwick · 441 residents51.61
  42. 14,33056129in Ellsworth · 761 residents51.37
  43. 14,75456158in Magnolia · 322 residents51.06
  44. 14,79456116in Beaver Creek · 559 residents51.04
  45. 15,30857104in Sioux Falls · 26,963 residents50.67
  46. 16,23556173in Steen · 307 residents50.01
  47. 17,14056138in Hills · 927 residents49.36
Open the full Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro ranking →One page, all 47 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

10 of 47 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Healthcare Access74%221,705 people

Standing highest: 57103 Sioux Falls57104 Sioux Falls57106 Sioux Falls

Social Need / SDOH56%168,997 people

Standing highest: 57005 Brandon57108 Sioux Falls57110 Sioux Falls

Chronic Disease Burden44%133,083 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 57032 Harrisburg57064 Tea57197 Sioux Falls

Risk Behavior27%80,787 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 57055 Renner57108 Sioux Falls57197 Sioux Falls

Disability27%80,688 people

Standing highest: 57032 Harrisburg57064 Tea57197 Sioux Falls

Environmental Hazard21%62,340 people

Standing highest: 57032 Harrisburg57041 Lyons57047 Monroe

Preventive Care15%43,853 people

Standing highest: 57041 Lyons57055 Renner57108 Sioux Falls

Mental Health14%43,589 people

Standing highest: 57027 Fairview57043 Marion57108 Sioux Falls

Climate / Disaster Risk5%14,325 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 56134 Hardwick57058 Salem57197 Sioux Falls

Each fifth is about 10 of this metro’s 47 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 300,874 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Sioux Falls, SD-MN figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.