ZIP code
57032
in Harrisburg, South DakotaPopulation 10,467
66.02/ 100
Ranked #1,611 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.1%)
Ranked #3 of 360 South Dakota ZIPs (top 0.9%)
Ranked #3 of 47 Sioux Falls, SD-MN ZIPs (top 6.4%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
23.8%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
26.8%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
23.3%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.4%
in the bottom 2.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
6.6%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Stroke
1.8%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
6.5%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
10.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.55%
in the bottom 4.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST9thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Mammography
82.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
Harrisburg, South Dakota (ZIP 57032), by its overall standing, sits in the top 5.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,611th) and the top 0.9% of South Dakota (3rd).
Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, high blood pressure lands in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, stroke rests in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and diabetes lies in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and poverty settles in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 3.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 0.9% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 57108, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sioux Falls, SD-MN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 97%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 84%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 68%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 97%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 54%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 50%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 57%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 44%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.9%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 96%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 54%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 48%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 29%
13%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 86%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 97%
14%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 67%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 50%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 17%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 28%
11%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
51241
Iowashares a border
Score 54.17
Closest healthier
57108
South Dakotashares a border
Score 67.16
Similar health profile
52340
Iowa99% similar profile
Score 65.34
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 17.1% | 15.2–19.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 23.3% | 20.7–26.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.4% | 5.8–7.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.6% | 8.5–10.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.4% | 3.0–3.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.7% | 3.2–4.4 |
| Depression among adults | 20.9% | 18.1–24.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 6.5% | 5.6–7.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 26.8% | 24.0–29.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.7% | 30.2–39.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 1.8% | 1.6–2.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.7% | 5.5–8.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.6% | 5.0–8.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 67.9% | 64.2–71.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 74.4% | 70.8–77.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.3% | 81.5–86.6 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.3% | 62.5–69.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 71.8% | 69.0–74.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.2% | 77.5–86.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 23.8% | 20.6–27.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.8% | 9.2–14.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 15.4% | 12.7–18.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.0% | 25.5–32.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 10.6% | 8.9–12.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.7% | 12.6–16.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.6% | 7.4–10.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.7% | 9.7–14.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 20.8% | 17.6–24.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.7% | 4.2–5.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.3–6.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 6.6% | 5.6–7.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.0% | 1.7–2.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.6% | 2.3–3.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.5% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.8% (1.1–33.5%) n=364 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.9% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 9.6% (0.0–33.2%) n=365 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.0% (0.8–15.3%) n=366 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 42.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 24.6% (10.3–40.7%) n=366 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.9% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 1.1% (0.0–8.0%) n=365 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 1.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=364 |
| Broadband subscription | 97.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.9% (73.7–96.3%) n=364 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 17.5% (5.2–30.6%) n=364 |
| Homeownership rate | 81.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.9% (57.2–94.8%) n=364 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.6% (0.0–10.2%) n=364 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.6% (0.0–5.3%) n=367 |
| Single-parent households | 40.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.7% (32.7–81.4%) n=362 |
| Population 65+ | 5.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.3% (8.4–33.0%) n=367 |
| Median age | 31.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (27.6–56.7) n=365 |
| Median household income | $111,528 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $74,865 ($51,211–$102,582) n=336 |
| Median home value | $330,400 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,400 ($79,000–$321,400) n=311 |
| Median gross rent | $1,362 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $763 ($544–$1,089) n=243 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | SD median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured