Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56279

in Pennock, MinnesotaPopulation 1,126

60.15/ 100

Ranked #4,748 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranked #126 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 14.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

34.4%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

35.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.2%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.2%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.5%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On the composite measure, Pennock, Minnesota (ZIP 56279) stands in the top 14.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,748th) and the top 14.6% of Minnesota (126th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and mobility disability settles in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Floodplain exposure rests in the bottom 11.6% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic lands in the top 2.4% nationally, binge drinking settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and radon rests in the top 10.0% nationally. Modeled fine-particle lands in the top 8.6% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 9.3% nationally.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. ZIP 56273, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 18.9; chronic-disease standing 85.6 — 67 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,092 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.8%19.0–24.7
High blood pressure among adults29.0%25.3–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.3–5.9
Depression among adults23.8%20.5–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%28.3–36.1
Obesity among adults39.7%32.8–46.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.2%4.9–7.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.5–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%72.5–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%70.6–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.1–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.0–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.3–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%73.2–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%16.6–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.8–15.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.4%16.9–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.8–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%12.0–16.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults11.1%9.6–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.8
Any disability among adults24.6%20.9–28.4
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Mobility disability among adults9.9%8.3–11.6
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%17.0–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.2–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Loneliness among adults29.2%24.8–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–6411.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate79.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households54.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$84,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$231,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,050$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.9 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 84.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured