Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56041

in Hanska, MinnesotaPopulation 1,039

54.41/ 100

Ranked #10,173 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #384 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

6.4%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

37.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.2%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.12%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

18.9 mi

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.4%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

28.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, Hanska, Minnesota (ZIP 56041) comes out in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,173rd) and the top 44% of Minnesota (384th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled pfas stands in the bottom 2.3% nationally, short sleep lands in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and loneliness is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled transportation noise resides in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and colon screening rests in the top 6.2% nationally. By contrast, modeled energy burden lies in the top 2.0% nationally, and arsenic sits in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled radon settles in the top 6.8% nationally, and distance to a community health center registers in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 10.5% nationally.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 56055, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.4–28.3
High blood pressure among adults33.6%30.0–37.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.8–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Depression among adults23.9%20.6–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.5–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%30.5–38.3
Obesity among adults36.3%30.1–43.2
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.0–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.7–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.0–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%73.1–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.8–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.4%68.8–77.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.3–70.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.0%71.5–84.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.5–21.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%12.9–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.3–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults27.9%22.4–33.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%13.8–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.8–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.1–14.6
Any disability among adults28.1%24.1–32.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.1–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.8–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.7%17.7–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.0–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.8–32.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–647.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate90.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households57.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+24.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age44.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$80,833$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$197,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.6 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 84.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured