Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03442

in Bennington, New HampshirePopulation 1,588

55.63/ 100

Ranked #8,705 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #179 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #27 of 34 Manchester-Nashua, NH ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

42.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

16.4 mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.1%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

14.5 mi

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Bennington, New Hampshire (ZIP 03442) stands in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,705th) and the bottom 26% of New Hampshire (179th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 13.8% nationally, poverty sits in the bottom 14.2% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 14.7% nationally. Modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled arsenic sits in the top 1.3% nationally, slow internet speeds resides in the top 10.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 12.8% nationally.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 03043, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Manchester-Nashua, NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%25.3–30.0
High blood pressure among adults33.3%30.6–35.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.6–8.0
Depression among adults23.1%20.4–25.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.5–37.8
Obesity among adults35.1%30.7–39.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%7.9–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.1–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.5–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.7–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.1–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%66.5–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.8%64.8–70.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%72.3–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%14.0–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.1–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.4–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%30.8–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%13.4–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.2–15.3
Any disability among adults27.4%24.0–30.8
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.2–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.2–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.3–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%5.8–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.3–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.3
Loneliness among adults32.5%29.1–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate74.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$83,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$267,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,292$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 1.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.40 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured