Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56136

in Hendricks, MinnesotaPopulation 1,203

54.42/ 100

Ranked #10,172 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #383 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4 pCi/L

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.82 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.82 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

100.7 mi

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.82 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.82 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hendricks, Minnesota (ZIP 56136), in overall standing, comes out in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,172nd) and the top 44% of Minnesota (383rd).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: elder services stands in the top 1.1% nationally, pharmacy resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and fiber broadband sits in the top 2.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Civic stands in the top 6.0% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Against that, modeled radon sits in the top 2.1% nationally, and fine-particle stands in the top 6.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 57026, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.9–34.0
High blood pressure among adults39.0%35.2–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.4–13.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.8–9.3
Depression among adults22.2%19.3–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.6–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.1–41.5
Obesity among adults37.0%30.5–43.5
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.6–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.9–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.6–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%87.0–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.4–74.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%65.2–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%73.5–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.9–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.3–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%23.0–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults27.9%23.1–33.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%16.0–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.3–15.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.3–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
Any disability among adults33.7%29.8–37.8
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.7
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.0–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.7–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.5–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.3–9.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.4–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.5
Loneliness among adults28.0%23.4–33.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription87.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate83.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households75.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+35.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age57.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$68,281$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$225,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$750$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured