ZIP code
56722
in Euclid, MinnesotaPopulation 377
55.01/ 100
Ranked #9,436 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)
Ranked #336 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 39%)
Ranked #15 of 31 Grand Forks, ND-MN ZIPs (top 48%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
36.3%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
6.0%
in the top 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS97thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
96.5 mi
in the top 3.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance
2.2%
in the top 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.
Full methodology ›Walkability
1.6 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 5.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST5thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
98.6%
in the top 5.4% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Mammography
82.1%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
1.9%
in the top 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
9.9%
in the bottom 8.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
33.3%
in the bottom 30% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST90thUS30thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite health measure, Euclid, Minnesota (ZIP 56722) ranks in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,436th) and the top 39% of Minnesota (336th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 3.9% nationally, and homeownership resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas stands in the bottom 8.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled arsenic lies in the top 2.1% nationally, energy burden lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and fine-particle sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Walkability is in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 6.2% nationally.
Read against the ZIPs closest to it, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Close by, ZIP 56723, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Forks, ND-MN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 63%
21%
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 61%
8%
Disability
healthier than 74%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 59%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 23%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 16%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 92%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 63%
8%
Disability
healthier than 60%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 66%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 40%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 57%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 37%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 18%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 36%
11%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 61%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 77%
11%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 65%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Disability
healthier than 42%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 14%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 20%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
56701
Minnesotashares a border
Score 51.54
Closest healthier
56723
Minnesotashares a border
Score 55.13
Similar health profile
56209
Minnesota98% similar profile
Score 56.17
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 27.8% | 24.7–31.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 33.4% | 29.6–37.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.7% | 9.6–11.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.3% | 9.1–11.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.1% | 6.2–8.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.6% | 5.3–8.0 |
| Depression among adults | 24.5% | 21.1–28.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 11.4% | 9.8–13.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.5% | 31.6–39.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.8% | 32.1–45.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.6% | 3.1–4.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 8.1% | 6.5–10.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.0% | 4.5–8.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.6% | 77.5–83.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 77.2% | 73.6–80.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.0% | 86.0–89.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 71.8% | 67.5–75.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 68.4% | 65.0–71.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 82.1% | 76.1–87.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 17.8% | 14.8–21.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.3% | 11.2–17.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.6% | 19.3–28.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.3% | 28.0–39.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.3% | 13.5–19.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.5% | 12.5–16.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.6% | 10.7–14.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 12.2% | 10.3–14.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 27.5% | 23.4–32.3 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.8% | 6.9–9.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.8–8.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.5–15.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.8–4.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.9% | 3.3–4.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.2% | 16.7–24.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 6.9–11.9 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 6.6% | 4.8–8.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.9–9.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.8–7.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.7% | 24.1–33.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.8% | 3.9–5.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 6.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 2.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 16.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871 |
| Broadband subscription | 92.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 89.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871 |
| Homeownership rate | 98.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 83.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873 |
| Single-parent households | 65.7% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870 |
| Population 65+ | 21.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873 |
| Median age | 47.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873 |
| Median household income | $94,375 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864 |
| Median home value | $217,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($650–$1,588) n=759 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 78.4 yr ± 0.63 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.63 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured