Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55921

in Caledonia, MinnesotaPopulation 4,659

56.06/ 100

Ranked #8,204 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #264 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #8 of 26 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

4.8%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.9%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.42 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

29.6 days/year

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Caledonia, Minnesota (ZIP 55921) stands in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,204th) and the top 30% of Minnesota (264th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled pfas sits in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 3.5% nationally. Mental-health providers stands in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 5.5% nationally. Pharmacy resides in the top 7.6% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled colon screening sits in the top 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon resides in the top 4.7% nationally, walkability stands in the bottom 13.9% nationally, and lead in tap water sits in the top 18% nationally.

For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 55941, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.5%23.4–29.9
High blood pressure among adults32.9%29.1–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.7–7.6
Depression among adults23.2%19.9–26.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.7–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%31.0–39.2
Obesity among adults34.9%28.4–42.1
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.2%8.2–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%6.0–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.0–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.6–78.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%66.0–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.0%63.6–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%68.3–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.1–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.6–32.1
Short sleep duration among adults28.9%23.3–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.1–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.3–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.5–15.0
Any disability among adults29.5%25.4–34.0
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.4
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.8–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.7–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.3–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.4–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription85.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households61.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age47.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$80,161$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$201,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$836$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured