Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54636

in Holmen, WisconsinPopulation 16,727

58.88/ 100

Ranked #5,688 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #128 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #4 of 26 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

45.6%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.2 mi

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.8%

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

Holmen, Wisconsin (ZIP 54636), by its overall standing, sits in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,688th) and the top 17% of Wisconsin (128th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled mammography lands in the top 2.3% nationally, utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled transportation rests in the bottom 9.9% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the bottom 10.4% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the bottom 13.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled nitrate settles in the top 1.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 5.8% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the top 8.2% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 54650, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 24.7; chronic-disease standing 78.0 — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,729 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.8%23.2–28.5
High blood pressure among adults29.8%26.6–33.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.8–9.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Depression among adults24.2%21.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.6–38.7
Obesity among adults37.7%32.3–43.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.2%6.5–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.8–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.6–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.1–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.1–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.9–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.9%68.5–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.1%77.2–87.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%17.0–23.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%10.6–14.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%20.1–26.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%27.5–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.8%12.9–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.4–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.5–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.2–12.9
Any disability among adults27.1%23.9–30.4
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.8–12.8
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.5–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.2–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.6–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)4.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)0.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households48.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$96,384$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$321,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,160$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured