Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55941

in Hokah, MinnesotaPopulation 1,072

57.62/ 100

Ranked #6,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #195 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #5 of 26 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.98 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.98 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.2%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

29.4%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.98 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

78.2%

in the bottom 13.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

28 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

6.0%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

53.7%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hokah, Minnesota (ZIP 55941) ranks in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,710th) and the top 23% of Minnesota (195th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: mental-health providers lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and outpatient is in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 4.4% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep is in the bottom 7.1% nationally, recreation registers in the top 9.3% nationally, and modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 12.2% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon lies in the top 8.2% nationally.

Against its neighbors, mental-health providers runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 55947, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.1%23.2–29.5
High blood pressure among adults32.8%29.2–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.3–7.3
Depression among adults22.8%19.7–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.6–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%31.7–39.9
Obesity among adults34.8%28.5–41.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.0–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.0–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%71.8–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.2%69.7–78.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.4–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.3–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.2–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%11.9–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.0–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults29.4%23.8–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.0–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.9
Any disability among adults27.4%23.6–31.5
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.8
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.8
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.6–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.1–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.5–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.8
Loneliness among adults28.6%24.4–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)2.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate70.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households57.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$72,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$219,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$907$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.3 yr ± 2.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.30 years of 87.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured