Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55812

in Duluth, MinnesotaPopulation 10,859

54.93/ 100

Ranked #9,516 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #342 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #21 of 65 Duluth, MN-WI ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

23%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

22.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

21.9%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

10 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.0%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.0%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.1%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8 ppb

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 55812, one of several in Duluth, Minnesota, on the composite measure, lands in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,516th) and the top 39% of Minnesota (342nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: modeled high cholesterol lies in the bottom 1.1% nationally, modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and transit stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the bottom 2.4% nationally, fatal road crashes rests in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Mental-health providers registers in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled stroke lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 5.0% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 55803, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Duluth, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
High blood pressure among adults21.9%19.3–24.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.8–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Depression among adults28.4%24.8–32.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened23.0%20.5–25.7
Obesity among adults33.5%28.7–38.5
Stroke among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.1%10.0–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%6.2–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure64.5%61.6–67.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.6%65.4–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults73.4%70.0–76.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%65.1–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.6%55.5–61.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%71.0–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.2%18.7–26.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%11.0–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.0–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%31.2–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.1–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.9%18.2–23.6
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.3–20.3
Any disability among adults30.5%26.4–34.5
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults9.1%7.8–10.4
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.6–10.1
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.4–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.1–19.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.2–15.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.8–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
Loneliness among adults38.4%34.4–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription95.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate42.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population3.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households52.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+10.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age23.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$65,505$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$322,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,170$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured