Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02115

in Boston, MassachusettsPopulation 29,705

55.89/ 100

Ranked #8,388 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #393 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #238 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

23.7%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

18.1%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

390 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

19.2%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

9.1%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,782 units

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

23 ppb

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

45.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

64.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

35.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 02115, one of several in Boston, Massachusetts, overall, ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,388th) and the bottom 25% of Massachusetts (393rd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 1.2% nationally, modeled high blood pressure resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and walkability settles in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.4% nationally. Set against that, modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness stands in the top 0.7% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the top 0.9% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 02116, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.2; chronic-disease standing 98.3 (top 10%) — 86 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,627 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults11.5%10.4–12.7
High blood pressure among adults18.1%16.3–19.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.2%3.0–3.5
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.9–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults3.2%3.0–3.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Depression among adults27.9%25.1–30.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened23.7%21.7–26.0
Obesity among adults19.2%16.3–22.4
Stroke among adults1.8%1.7–1.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.5–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.7–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure58.6%56.8–60.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.4%71.4–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults76.3%73.7–78.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%61.9–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%58.6–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.0%77.3–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.8%19.3–24.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.2%7.9–10.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.5%19.9–25.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%29.1–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.5–18.3
Frequent mental distress among adults22.9%20.7–25.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%18.2–22.6
Any disability among adults28.6%25.7–31.7
Hearing disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.0%23.1–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%18.4–24.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.2–26.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.8%13.1–16.7
Loneliness among adults45.2%41.3–49.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate36.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)7.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle64.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)53.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate14.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population24.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+10.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age21.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$54,991$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$945,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,039$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured