Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55030

in Grasston, MinnesotaPopulation 1,711

50.21/ 100

Ranked #15,941 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #683 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

43.5 mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

29.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

13.2%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Grasston, Minnesota (ZIP 55030) stands in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,941st) and the bottom 21% of Minnesota (683rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 14.6% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the bottom 16% nationally. Households without a vehicle rests in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, distance to a community health center lands in the top 1.7% nationally, modeled fine-particle settles in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the top 9.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes lands in the top 14.1% nationally, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 12.7% nationally, and modeled radon rests in the top 16% nationally. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For clarity, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 55069, about 4.4 miles away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.7–28.9
High blood pressure among adults35.4%32.2–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.3–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.9–7.9
Depression among adults25.6%22.8–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.4–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.9–38.5
Obesity among adults38.1%32.6–43.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.4–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.0–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.2–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%72.2–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.4–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%61.2–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.7–65.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%68.9–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%16.3–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.5–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%21.9–29.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%28.1–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.0–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.9–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–15.8
Any disability among adults31.2%27.8–35.0
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.8
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.8–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%19.1–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.9–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.4–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription86.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+18.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$81,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$195,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,739$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured