Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

56527

in Deer Creek, MinnesotaPopulation 881

50.79/ 100

Ranked #15,166 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #653 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

69.8 mi

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.8 days/year

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

0.24%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Deer Creek, Minnesota (ZIP 56527) sits in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,166th) and the bottom 25% of Minnesota (653rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 13.2% nationally, and short sleep lands in the bottom 19% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a community health center resides in the top 0.3% nationally, and modeled fine-particle lies in the top 2.9% nationally. Walkability settles in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the top 17% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In plain language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 56361, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%24.0–29.8
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.0–34.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Depression among adults25.4%22.3–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.6–40.8
Obesity among adults36.0%30.7–41.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.9–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.5%5.9–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.7–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.5%70.9–77.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.3–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.2–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.5%62.2–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%69.9–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%14.9–20.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.9%15.0–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.8–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.8–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.6%15.8–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.8–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.1–16.2
Any disability among adults30.0%26.0–34.1
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.1–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.7–16.1
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.9–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.1–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.7–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.0–11.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.4–8.7
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.3–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate85.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households54.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$64,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$217,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$390$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.05 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured