Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55056

in North Branch, MinnesotaPopulation 14,753

55.59/ 100

Ranked #8,760 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #297 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #164 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

23.1 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

44.9%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, North Branch, Minnesota (ZIP 55056) sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,760th) and the top 34% of Minnesota (297th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography resides in the top 12.9% nationally, and short sleep lies in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the bottom 14.7% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 17% nationally. Working the other way, distance to a community health center is in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the top 8.8% nationally, and pfas registers in the top 17% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 55012, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%21.7–26.8
High blood pressure among adults31.0%27.8–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–8.9
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Depression among adults25.2%22.1–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%30.4–37.2
Obesity among adults36.4%31.1–42.0
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%8.7–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.2–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%72.7–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.1%70.6–77.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.3–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%65.0–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.0%62.7–69.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.7%73.9–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.5–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%20.2–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%26.8–36.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%14.2–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.6–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.7–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.6
Any disability among adults28.8%25.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.6–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Loneliness among adults28.8%25.4–33.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$95,679$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$331,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,314$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured