Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

55045

in Lindstrom, MinnesotaPopulation 7,846

58.05/ 100

Ranked #6,351 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #186 of 866 Minnesota ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #137 of 224 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

26.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

23.3 mi

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.4%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.7%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Lindstrom, Minnesota (ZIP 55045) lands in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,351st) and the top 21% of Minnesota (186th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally, colon screening registers in the top 8.2% nationally, and mammography resides in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 13.0% nationally, utility shutoff is in the bottom 13.5% nationally, and tooth loss sits in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lands in the bottom 16% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the bottom 16% nationally. Set against that, distance to a community health center stands in the top 6.5% nationally, and modeled fine-particle rests in the top 6.9% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. On the overall standing, ZIP 55012, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.7%23.6–29.7
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.3–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults24.4%21.0–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.2–39.9
Obesity among adults36.5%30.4–42.4
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.9%6.2–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.1–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.0–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%72.7–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.1–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.7%68.3–76.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.6%65.2–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%73.7–85.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%15.3–21.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.2–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%18.6–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%25.5–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.3–17.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.0–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.4–13.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Any disability among adults28.0%24.3–31.8
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.3–13.7
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.2%16.4–22.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.5–7.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults26.7%23.0–30.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.4% (3.6–16.8%) n=872
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.2% (2.3–12.7%) n=872
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.5% (2.2–11.2%) n=873
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.4% (13.6–48.8%) n=873
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.8–7.1%) n=872
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.4% (0.4–9.1%) n=871
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (81.6–95.3%) n=871
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.1% (14.0–31.1%) n=871
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.9% (67.0–94.0%) n=871
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.9%) n=871
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.1–11.9%) n=873
Single-parent households50.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.9% (44.1–70.7%) n=870
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–30.7%) n=873
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (35.2–54.3) n=873
Median household income$108,929$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$77,917 ($58,441–$110,840) n=864
Median home value$390,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$234,000 ($132,740–$396,860) n=857
Median gross rent$1,210$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($650–$1,588) n=759
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.1 yr (78.3–84.8) n=864

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured