Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54651

in Ontario, WisconsinPopulation 1,384

43.31/ 100

Ranked #24,097 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #740 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranked #25 of 26 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

7.5%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

13.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.3%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.17%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.64%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

56.9%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

11.2%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

5.4%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

19%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

25%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ontario, Wisconsin (ZIP 54651), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 25% nationally (24,097th) and the bottom 3.1% of Wisconsin (740th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas stands in the bottom 12.3% nationally. By contrast, crowded housing lands in the top 7.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle is in the top 8.8% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and modeled obesity rests in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies in the top 14.2% nationally, and slow internet speeds sits in the top 16% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 54619, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.8; chronic-disease standing 25.9 — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,892 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%28.9–34.3
High blood pressure among adults37.9%34.8–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.3–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.4–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Depression among adults24.6%21.7–27.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.7–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.7–40.4
Obesity among adults42.7%36.6–48.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%13.1–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.1–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.5–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.3–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.3–84.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.3–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.8%53.8–59.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%69.1–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.8–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.9%18.2–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.9%30.6–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%28.2–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.0%22.0–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.3–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.9–18.6
Any disability among adults37.1%33.2–41.0
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.8–21.3
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%19.0–24.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.3–20.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.3–24.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.8–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.1–10.4
Loneliness among adults31.0%27.3–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6420.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)16.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle13.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription74.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$62,159$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$172,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$740$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured