Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22529

in Oldhams, VirginiaPopulation 200

45.35/ 100

Ranked #22,042 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #645 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

19.7%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

13.3%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

26.2%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.7%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

13.1%

in the top 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Oldhams, Virginia (ZIP 22529), overall, ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,042nd) and the bottom 26% of Virginia (645th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled short sleep rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the top 9.4% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation settles in the top 9.5% nationally. On the brighter side, poverty is at the national minimum, and homeownership sits at the national maximum. Home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 9.1% nationally.

Defined simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 22572, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.3%25.0–31.6
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.9–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.4–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.6–9.7
Depression among adults22.4%18.8–25.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.2–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%32.6–41.4
Obesity among adults43.7%35.3–52.2
Stroke among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.4–17.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%11.4–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.7–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.5–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.0–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.6%64.7–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.6%50.9–58.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%70.3–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%10.8–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%14.3–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%27.5–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.0%36.3–50.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.0%23.0–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.5–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.6–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.2–21.8
Any disability among adults38.5%33.0–43.9
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Independent living disability among adults11.3%9.5–13.2
Mobility disability among adults19.0%16.0–22.1
Self-care disability among adults5.7%4.7–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.6–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%22.5–31.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.2%21.0–31.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.1%19.3–29.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.2–23.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.1–15.9
Loneliness among adults37.1%31.6–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.9–15.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)69.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households0.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age23.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$173,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured