Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

54624

in De Soto, WisconsinPopulation 1,554

52.14/ 100

Ranked #13,264 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #472 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #21 of 26 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

38.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

14.2 mi

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.1%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

55.2%

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

De Soto, Wisconsin (ZIP 54624), by its overall standing, sits in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,264th) and the bottom 38% of Wisconsin (472nd).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: fiber broadband is in the top 3.5% nationally, modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and civic rests in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 8.7% nationally, modeled pfas sits in the bottom 9.3% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff settles in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 16% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon stands in the top 9.7% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled disaster risk is in the top 10.7% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 54632, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%30.3–36.8
High blood pressure among adults39.4%35.6–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%10.0–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Depression among adults22.2%19.2–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.4–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%35.9–43.3
Obesity among adults39.5%33.0–45.9
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.7%9.1–12.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.7–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.8–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.2–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%87.4–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.6–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.8–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.9%72.6–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.3–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.4–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%24.7–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%26.7–36.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.1–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.0–14.2
Any disability among adults31.8%28.0–35.7
Hearing disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.0%16.2–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%8.9–13.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.0–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Loneliness among adults27.6%23.6–31.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)6.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households67.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age55.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$81,518$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$186,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$793$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured