Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52101

in Decorah, IowaPopulation 12,706

58.53/ 100

Ranked #5,971 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #98 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 10.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.1 pCi/L

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

27.2%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8.6 ppb

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

26 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

15.0%

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US84th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Decorah, Iowa (ZIP 52101) lands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,971st) and the top 10.7% of Iowa (98th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled short sleep is in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and utility shutoff lies in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 10.4% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 10.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon registers in the top 1.7% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled binge drinking is in the top 6.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. No nearby ZIP ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.2 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $73,484 predicts 78.9 years — 3.3 years above.

    Ranked #349 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.6%23.5–29.8
High blood pressure among adults32.8%28.9–36.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.2
Depression among adults19.6%16.5–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.7–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%30.6–38.9
Obesity among adults34.1%27.0–41.7
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.5–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.8–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.3–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%82.9–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.2–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.0%68.8–75.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%69.8–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%16.6–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.9%10.1–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.1–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults27.2%22.1–33.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%12.9–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.4–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.2–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
Any disability among adults25.8%21.9–29.8
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.6
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.6
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.9–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.1–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–8.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.0–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate70.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households64.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$73,484$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$273,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$883$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.2 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 82.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured