Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53588

in Spring Green, WisconsinPopulation 3,770

55.87/ 100

Ranked #8,422 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #256 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

5.7%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.24 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.4%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.48 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Spring Green, Wisconsin (ZIP 53588) sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,422nd) and the top 34% of Wisconsin (256th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: elder services stands in the top 5.8% nationally, modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 8.5% nationally. Civic sits in the top 13.2% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation resides in the bottom 13.7% nationally, and loneliness lies in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled nitrate settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plain language, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 53503, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%28.0–34.2
High blood pressure among adults36.0%32.4–39.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.4
Depression among adults23.4%20.3–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.9–41.4
Obesity among adults39.1%33.1–45.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.2–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.9–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.2–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.9–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%68.3–76.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%66.0–72.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%72.3–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.0–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%12.1–16.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%25.2–33.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.1–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.3%15.9–20.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.8
Any disability among adults31.9%28.2–35.9
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.2–17.3
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.5%15.9–21.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.5–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults29.1%25.1–33.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households66.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+26.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age54.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$83,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$292,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$988$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured