Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14033

in Colden, New YorkPopulation 1,539

62.74/ 100

Ranked #3,109 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #409 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #17 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.4 ppb

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.5%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27.6%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.9%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Colden, New York (ZIP 14033) lands in the top 9.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,109th) and the top 24% of New York (409th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fatal road crashes registers at the national minimum, and elder services rests in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the top 3.1% nationally, and loneliness lies in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Unemployment is at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening settles in the top 4.8% nationally, and transportation resides in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Set against that, lead in tap water registers in the top 3.8% nationally.

A note on the terms: lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 14075, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.4–34.4
High blood pressure among adults34.1%30.7–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%9.9–12.2
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%5.7–8.1
Depression among adults20.5%17.9–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%8.9–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.7%37.2–44.2
Obesity among adults31.2%26.9–35.3
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.8–12.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.9%3.1–4.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.1–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.6%82.2–86.8
Cholesterol screening among adults92.1%90.9–93.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.0%70.7–77.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%68.0–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.5%77.9–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.8–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.0–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%18.3–25.3
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%31.0–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.7%12.5–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.5–16.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.2–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.9%8.5–11.5
Any disability among adults22.9%19.8–26.3
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.3–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.3–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.7–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.4%5.7–9.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.5–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Loneliness among adults27.6%23.9–31.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.2–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)1.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate90.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households76.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+28.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age52.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$87,431$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$338,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$970$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 1.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.64 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured