Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14131

in Ransomville, New YorkPopulation 5,252

59.02/ 100

Ranked #5,580 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #694 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #37 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

4.7%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Ransomville, New York (ZIP 14131) sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,580th) and the top 40% of New York (694th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 11.6% nationally, cognitive disability lands in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and uninsured resides in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 17% nationally, and colon screening settles in the top 15% nationally. Against that, walkability stands in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 13.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 14092, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.5 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.1 years — 2.4 years above them.

    Ranked #1,179 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.4–32.9
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.2–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.2
Depression among adults20.5%17.7–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.6–41.9
Obesity among adults37.8%31.7–45.0
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.8–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.7%3.9–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.3–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.4–85.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.6–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%66.6–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.7%65.6–71.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%72.1–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.9–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.6–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.9%20.2–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%30.2–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%14.0–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.9
Any disability among adults26.4%23.0–30.3
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.6–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.4–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.8–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Loneliness among adults28.7%24.3–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate87.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households56.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age47.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$85,909$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$211,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$885$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured