Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53070

in Oostburg, WisconsinPopulation 4,951

59.06/ 100

Ranked #5,554 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #123 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #5 of 14 Sheboygan, WI ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Oostburg, Wisconsin (ZIP 53070) lands in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,554th) and the top 16% of Wisconsin (123rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and grocery rests in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and loneliness lies in the bottom 10.3% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled food insecurity is in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and mammography settles in the top 12.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 7.4% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 53013, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sheboygan, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%25.1–32.2
High blood pressure among adults36.4%32.2–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.0–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.5–7.5
Depression among adults22.3%18.7–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.5–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.2%31.9–40.5
Obesity among adults36.1%29.8–42.7
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.7–13.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%4.9–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%75.6–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.4–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.2–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.1–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.1–72.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.8%73.6–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%16.2–23.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.7–15.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%22.6–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%27.0–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%14.2–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.0–13.5
Any disability among adults28.8%24.6–33.2
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.4
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.3%15.5–21.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.1–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.2–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.0
Loneliness among adults28.5%24.6–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population3.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households64.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$91,557$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$282,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$827$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured