Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53083

in Sheboygan, WisconsinPopulation 21,579

59.28/ 100

Ranked #5,378 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #117 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #4 of 14 Sheboygan, WI ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.1 µg/L

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57.2%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.5%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Radon

1 pCi/L

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 53083, one of several in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, by its overall standing, sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,378th) and the top 15% of Wisconsin (117th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: lithium in drinking water lands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Transit rests in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff lies in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled mammography settles in the top 8.7% nationally. By contrast, distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and modeled binge drinking stands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 9.2% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 53020, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sheboygan, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.4%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%22.9–29.4
High blood pressure among adults34.3%30.3–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%8.9–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.8
Depression among adults21.9%18.4–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.2–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%30.6–39.0
Obesity among adults35.9%29.6–42.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.9–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.0–80.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.4–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.0–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.1–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.2–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.5%74.4–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%16.3–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.8%10.7–14.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.8–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%27.3–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.2–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%12.9–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.0–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.2–13.3
Any disability among adults27.7%23.7–31.6
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.7–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.6–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.9–11.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.0–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Loneliness among adults29.1%25.5–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate73.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age40.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$75,203$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$244,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,052$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured