Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14004

in Alden, New YorkPopulation 11,396

58.88/ 100

Ranked #5,686 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #702 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #39 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

5.4 ppb

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Alden, New York (ZIP 14004), by its composite score, sits in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,686th) and the top 41% of New York (702nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability lands in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and humid heat stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the bottom 11.7% nationally. By contrast, lead in tap water settles in the top 9.0% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled radon lies in the top 17% nationally, binge drinking rests in the top 14.9% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 17% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the top 19% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 14031, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.8%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.8%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.2–31.5
High blood pressure among adults33.6%30.7–36.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.7
Depression among adults20.1%17.6–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.4–41.6
Obesity among adults31.7%27.7–35.7
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.9%10.0–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.8–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.4–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%80.2–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.6–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%65.6–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.9–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%73.6–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%15.9–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.7%11.1–14.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%20.9–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.4%34.0–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.5–18.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.9–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.8–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%10.1–12.6
Any disability among adults24.7%22.1–27.6
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%21.0–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.2–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.9–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate85.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households57.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$90,839$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$258,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$938$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.76 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured