Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14209

in Buffalo, New YorkPopulation 8,313

61.30/ 100

Ranked #3,941 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #509 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #24 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.48 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

10 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.85 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.36 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

33.7%

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

20.7%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 14209, one of several in Buffalo, New York, in overall standing, comes out in the top 12.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,941st) and the top 29% of New York (509th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: mental-health providers resides in the top 0.9% nationally, transit sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 2.7% nationally. Physicians resides in the top 3.0% nationally, floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and modeled mammography stands in the top 1.8% nationally. Elder services resides in the top 3.6% nationally. On the other hand, homeownership sits in the bottom 3.9% nationally, and households without a vehicle stands in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 14222, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.2%23.8–28.5
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.4–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Depression among adults19.3%16.8–21.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.4–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%31.9–37.9
Obesity among adults33.9%29.7–38.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.3–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.9%4.9–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.3–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.8–85.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.9–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.6%70.3–76.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.3%62.5–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.5%79.3–87.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.4–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%9.1–12.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%21.5–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%34.5–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Any disability among adults25.0%22.1–27.8
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.5–14.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.8–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.6–18.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.3–17.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.6–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)8.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle20.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate33.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population11.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households45.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+26.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$50,046$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$429,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,141$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured