Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52571

in Moravia, IowaPopulation 1,660

48.68/ 100

Ranked #18,102 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #752 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.9%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

42.2%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

28.5%

in the top 38% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US62nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Moravia, Iowa (ZIP 52571) ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,102nd) and the bottom 18% of Iowa (752nd).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: civic lies in the top 8.2% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Lead in tap water registers in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled mammography lies in the top 15% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon is in the top 5.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden lies in the top 12.3% nationally, obesity is in the top 15% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 18% nationally. Modeled disaster risk lies in the top 19% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 52531, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%30.2–36.9
High blood pressure among adults42.2%38.3–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.4–11.1
Depression among adults21.3%18.3–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.4–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%35.9–44.3
Obesity among adults41.5%34.6–48.9
Stroke among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.5–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.7–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.5–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.0–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.9%65.3–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.9%61.5–68.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.5–84.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.2–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.9–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%24.0–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.2–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.0–23.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.4–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–16.2
Any disability among adults33.0%29.0–37.6
Hearing disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.9
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.5–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.2–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.4–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Loneliness among adults30.7%26.4–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6411.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households61.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$81,953$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$197,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$814$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured