Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23022

in Bremo Bluff, VirginiaPopulation 1,006

47.46/ 100

Ranked #19,599 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #566 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #34 of 36 Charlottesville, VA ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

72.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

19.4%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

21.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.3%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

18.5 mi

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

39.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bremo Bluff, Virginia (ZIP 23022) places in the bottom 39% nationally (19,599th) and the bottom 35% of Virginia (566th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: housing-cost burden registers in the top 0.7% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 2.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits in the top 4.1% nationally, and modeled obesity lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room rests in the top 6.6% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the top 7.0% nationally, and modeled diabetes is in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 7.9% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 7.5% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 22963, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Charlottesville, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 72.4; chronic-disease standing 14.5 — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,892 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.0%30.4–37.7
High blood pressure among adults46.9%42.4–51.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.5–10.4
Depression among adults20.6%17.5–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%15.8–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.3%36.9–45.9
Obesity among adults45.3%37.0–53.6
Stroke among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.3–18.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.1–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.5–84.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%79.8–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.7–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%66.0–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%61.1–67.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%72.9–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.6–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.1–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%24.7–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%33.2–46.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%20.7–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.2–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.2–17.7
Any disability among adults36.6%31.7–41.7
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.5–11.5
Mobility disability among adults20.1%17.2–23.1
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.3
Vision disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.4–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%15.2–22.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.3%14.3–21.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.3–17.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.4
Loneliness among adults33.1%27.6–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.9–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)11.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)19.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle21.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription74.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)72.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate81.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households9.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age31.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$225,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured