Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52536

in Blakesburg, IowaPopulation 814

48.80/ 100

Ranked #17,912 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #744 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST49th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.67%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

29.2%

in the top 37% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US63rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Blakesburg, Iowa (ZIP 52536), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 44% nationally (17,912th) and the bottom 19% of Iowa (744th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: recreation resides in the top 8.7% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the bottom 19% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon settles in the top 5.7% nationally, energy burden stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 12.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Slow internet speeds sits in the top 16% nationally. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking lands in the top 17% nationally, and lithium in drinking water resides in the top 20% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 52531, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%29.1–35.2
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.2–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Depression among adults21.1%18.4–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.8–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%36.0–43.4
Obesity among adults40.6%34.8–46.6
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.1–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%79.0–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.4–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.0–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.6–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.2%61.0–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%71.4–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.6–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%14.8–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%24.4–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%29.9–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.1%17.5–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.2–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.0
Any disability among adults31.9%28.1–35.9
Hearing disability among adults8.8%8.0–9.9
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%20.0–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.0–14.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.9–7.8
Loneliness among adults32.0%28.0–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households71.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+37.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age55.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$75,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$133,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$626$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured