Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51536

in Hancock, IowaPopulation 613

48.72/ 100

Ranked #18,054 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #751 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #103 of 113 Omaha, NE-IA ZIPs (bottom 8.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.3 pCi/L

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

9.3%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.9 mi

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

19.2%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.9%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

8.9%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Hancock, Iowa (ZIP 51536) stands in the bottom 44% nationally (18,054th) and the bottom 19% of Iowa (751st).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 14.6% nationally, and unemployment rests in the bottom 15% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon lands in the top 1.2% nationally, modeled nitrate settles in the top 3.2% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands in the top 9.6% nationally, and modeled binge drinking settles in the top 12.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

For clarity, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 51521, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Omaha, NE-IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%28.9–35.3
High blood pressure among adults40.5%36.7–44.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.4%10.3–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.5
Depression among adults20.9%18.0–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.6–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.1–44.6
Obesity among adults38.6%33.2–43.7
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.5–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.2–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.9–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.1–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%62.2–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.0–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%73.4–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.9–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.1–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.1–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%28.4–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%16.6–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.8–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.6–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Any disability among adults32.8%28.8–36.9
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.0–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.4–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.5–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.8–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Loneliness among adults32.7%28.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6416.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription84.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate80.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households55.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+22.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$101,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$163,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$862$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured