Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52175

in West Union, IowaPopulation 3,484

48.85/ 100

Ranked #17,857 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #741 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.29 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

29.8 mi

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.29 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, West Union, Iowa (ZIP 52175) sits in the bottom 44% nationally (17,857th) and the bottom 20% of Iowa (741st).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: civic resides in the top 3.1% nationally, pharmacy sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and grocery stands in the top 3.8% nationally. Elder services resides in the top 4.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Outpatient stands in the top 5.7% nationally, and recreation resides in the top 6.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon sits in the top 2.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 7.7% nationally.

Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 52135, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.9–33.7
High blood pressure among adults39.0%35.0–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.6–10.4
Depression among adults20.3%17.3–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.0–42.2
Obesity among adults38.8%31.9–45.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.7%20.6–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.8–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.3–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.7–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.5–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.3%64.5–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.5–67.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.4–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.9%16.7–23.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.2–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.8%25.1–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.8%26.3–38.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%18.0–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.7–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.8–16.9
Any disability among adults32.0%27.8–36.6
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.7
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.7–10.4
Mobility disability among adults16.2%13.7–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.0–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.0–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.7
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.1–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle9.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate66.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$59,800$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$160,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$944$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured