Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50556

in Ledyard, IowaPopulation 159

46.08/ 100

Ranked #21,252 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #853 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

46.7 mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

35.6%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.5%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.3%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$36,607

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On the composite measure, Ledyard, Iowa (ZIP 50556) stands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,252nd) and the bottom 7.5% of Iowa (853rd).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: distance to a community health center rests in the top 1.4% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled arsenic settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and energy burden rests in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 7.7% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the top 8.7% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled transportation noise rests at the national minimum, and fiber broadband lands in the top 3.7% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas rests in the bottom 7.4% nationally.

For clarity, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 50424, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 1%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%30.4–38.0
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.0–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.6%10.3–12.8
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.0–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.6–12.0
Depression among adults19.8%16.8–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.3–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%36.1–45.3
Obesity among adults40.4%32.7–48.7
Stroke among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.0%10.5–15.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.7–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.4%80.7–85.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.3–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%66.3–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.2%58.5–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%67.5–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.6–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.1–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%24.3–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%28.3–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%18.4–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.5–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.1–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%11.9–16.0
Any disability among adults33.7%28.8–38.7
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Mobility disability among adults17.6%14.8–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.3–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.2–15.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.4–14.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–8.1
Loneliness among adults29.3%24.7–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription78.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate92.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households89.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+56.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age67.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$36,607$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$413$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.4 yr ± 2.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.04 years of 83.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured