Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51433

in Auburn, IowaPopulation 567

51.84/ 100

Ranked #13,656 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #507 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

11.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

26 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.6%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

48.5%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.6%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

55.8 mi

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

20.8%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Auburn, Iowa (ZIP 51433) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,656th) and the bottom 45% of Iowa (507th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled pfas registers in the bottom 6.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 10.0% nationally. Against that, modeled radon rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and crowded housing is in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands in the top 4.4% nationally, distance to a community health center settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled binge drinking lies in the top 7.0% nationally. Homeownership resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic lands in the top 8.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 50583, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.2–33.0
High blood pressure among adults36.2%32.8–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.2
Current asthma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.5–8.5
Depression among adults20.3%17.6–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%33.1–40.4
Obesity among adults40.6%34.0–47.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.7–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.0–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.5–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.7–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.3–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.6–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.8%64.8–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%72.0–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.8%17.1–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%21.4–29.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%28.5–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.7–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.6–14.7
Any disability among adults29.4%25.9–33.1
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.6
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
Mobility disability among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.1–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.6–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–6.8
Loneliness among adults30.3%26.2–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6413.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription85.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate48.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)11.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households63.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$68,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$153,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$774$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured