Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50569

in Otho, IowaPopulation 551

51.83/ 100

Ranked #13,672 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #508 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.9%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

58.7 mi

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.6%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$44,375

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Otho, Iowa (ZIP 50569) ranks in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,672nd) and the bottom 45% of Iowa (508th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: fiber broadband rests in the top 6.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 13.1% nationally, and mammography rests in the top 11.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled radon lands in the top 2.8% nationally, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 8.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Household income lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity rests in the top 15% nationally.

For context, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 50557, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.6–35.6
High blood pressure among adults40.5%36.3–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
Depression among adults20.0%17.0–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%34.3–42.8
Obesity among adults41.5%34.7–48.4
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%7.7–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.3–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.0–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.6–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.8–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%63.9–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%63.5–70.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%72.8–85.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.4–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.8–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.9–32.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%29.4–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.1–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.4–15.0
Any disability among adults29.0%24.9–33.2
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.5–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.6–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.0–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.3–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.9–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.2–7.0
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.4–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription74.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate77.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households72.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age53.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$44,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$96,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$665$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured