Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50858

in Orient, IowaPopulation 848

51.43/ 100

Ranked #14,219 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #535 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.9%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27.2 mi

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Orient, Iowa (ZIP 50858) sits in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,219th) and the bottom 42% of Iowa (535th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas resides in the bottom 15.0% nationally, and households without a vehicle sits in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 4.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 4.9% nationally, and modeled binge drinking stands in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled fine-particle stands in the top 17% nationally.

Put plainly, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 50155, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%26.1–33.0
High blood pressure among adults37.6%33.3–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.1
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
Depression among adults20.3%17.1–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.3–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%33.0–41.9
Obesity among adults39.4%31.4–48.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%7.7–11.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.4%5.1–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.8–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.1–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.2–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.6–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%68.9–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%16.8–23.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.1–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%21.0–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%26.2–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.2–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.5–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.5–15.0
Any disability among adults29.0%24.8–33.3
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.5–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.7–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.4–12.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.2–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.7–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.1–7.1
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.6–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)13.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription84.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate83.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households65.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age42.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$71,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$150,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,347$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 1.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.68 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured