Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51026

in Hornick, IowaPopulation 910

51.85/ 100

Ranked #13,649 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #506 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #16 of 30 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.5 pCi/L

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

54.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.7%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

22.9%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.6%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.99%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.9%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93.5%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

25.1 days/year

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

31.9%

in the top 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US76th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

  • USGS models a high likelihood that groundwater arsenic here exceeds 10 µg/L — the level EPA sets as the limit for public water systems — and this area's modeled radon runs above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level.

    See the full radon & arsenic analysis →

The read

In its overall standing, Hornick, Iowa (ZIP 51026) lands in the top 43% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,649th) and the bottom 45% of Iowa (506th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: fiber broadband resides in the top 7.3% nationally, and homeownership settles in the top 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 3.9% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled fine-particle registers in the top 9.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 9.8% nationally.

Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. On the overall standing, ZIP 51007, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sioux City, IA-NE-SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.9–30.0
High blood pressure among adults35.8%32.9–38.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.2
Depression among adults20.1%17.7–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%33.1–39.1
Obesity among adults37.9%33.6–42.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%10.0–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.1–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.2–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%75.6–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.1–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%65.1–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.3%64.6–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%72.6–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.7%18.1–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.6–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%21.1–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%27.4–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.9–19.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.4–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.5%11.1–14.2
Any disability among adults26.6%23.7–29.8
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%20.0–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.5–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Loneliness among adults30.6%27.2–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription74.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate93.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households64.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+18.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$80,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$211,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.1478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured