Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51051

in Rodney, IowaPopulation 39

50.02/ 100

Ranked #16,222 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #660 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

16.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27.8 mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.0%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

14.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.7%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Rodney, Iowa (ZIP 51051) lands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,222nd) and the bottom 28% of Iowa (660th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled radon lands in the top 2.2% nationally, and unemployment registers in the top 3.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits in the top 4.7% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled arsenic is in the top 10.0% nationally. Better still, fiber broadband stands at the national maximum, modeled transportation noise settles in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss resides in the bottom 9.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 51026, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.6%30.6–38.7
High blood pressure among adults43.2%38.3–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.1–13.8
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.3–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%7.5–11.3
Depression among adults18.7%15.6–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.1–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%35.7–45.0
Obesity among adults41.7%33.6–50.2
Stroke among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.1–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%4.7–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%80.2–85.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%77.9–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.3–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%62.7–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.3–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%68.9–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.3–20.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%12.6–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%22.2–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.1–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%16.2–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.5–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.3–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%10.6–15.1
Any disability among adults32.2%27.0–38.0
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.3–12.3
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.3–9.1
Mobility disability among adults16.5%13.4–19.9
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.3–4.9
Vision disability among adults4.7%3.9–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%18.8–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.5–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.2–10.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%5.9–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.5–6.6
Loneliness among adults30.4%25.5–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.2–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)6.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)16.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle9.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households38.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age60.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$51,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$170,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.66 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured