Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51061

in Washta, IowaPopulation 389

50.02/ 100

Ranked #16,214 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #659 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

16.8%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.9%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.3%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

20.5 mi

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.1%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$49,375

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

19.3%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Washta, Iowa (ZIP 51061), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 49% nationally (16,214th) and the bottom 29% of Iowa (659th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled radon is in the top 2.6% nationally, modeled nitrate rests in the top 2.4% nationally, and unemployment sits in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled arsenic registers in the top 7.3% nationally, distance to a community health center lands in the top 7.9% nationally, and modeled fine-particle resides in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the top 8.8% nationally. More positively, housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 12.4% nationally.

In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 51025, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.4–33.1
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.7–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.0–9.5
Depression among adults21.1%18.2–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.7–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.8–43.0
Obesity among adults40.7%33.4–47.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.5–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.4–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.2–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%75.2–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.3–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.2–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.0%60.8–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.5–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.5–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%13.9–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%22.8–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%26.4–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%15.9–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.8–15.4
Any disability among adults28.8%25.0–33.1
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.2–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.9–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%19.9–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.2–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–12.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.4–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.5–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6416.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)7.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)11.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription82.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate88.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households81.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+52.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age70.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$49,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$77,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$431$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured