Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50531

in Dolliver, IowaPopulation 325

53.83/ 100

Ranked #10,913 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #347 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.6%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

27.7%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

30.9 mi

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

99.3%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.8%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.5%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.09%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Dolliver, Iowa (ZIP 50531) lands in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,913th) and the top 38% of Iowa (347th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled pfas rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and housing insecurity is in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Homeownership stands in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled transportation settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and colon screening lands in the top 5.1% nationally. Against that, modeled arsenic registers in the top 3.7% nationally, distance to a community health center sits in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled radon rests in the top 6.8% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 51365, about 4.9 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

in the top 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%32.0–40.5
High blood pressure among adults43.9%39.2–49.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%11.8–14.6
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.3–10.3
Depression among adults18.4%15.5–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%11.9–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.1–47.9
Obesity among adults41.6%33.5–50.5
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.3–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%3.7–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.5%81.8–87.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.3–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.5–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.9%69.1–78.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.8%67.5–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%74.1–86.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.4–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%11.4–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.1–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.0–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%15.0–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.2–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.5–13.1
Any disability among adults29.5%24.9–34.4
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.0–8.3
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.2–18.7
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.1–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.5–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.4–8.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.1–7.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%3.9–5.7
Loneliness among adults28.5%23.6–33.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.7–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate99.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households82.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$93,036$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$152,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured